Here is my pick (youĬan choose your own, just remember to add an extra 10% to the Phoronix Latest workstation and mobile CPUs from Intel and AMD. The two classes of CPU that seem relevant to compare to are the So let's add some interesting results from the Phoronixīenchmark. Nobody will argue that this compares apples to oranges on multipleĭimensions (workstation vs mobile, several years old design/process vs theīleeding edge, etc). Here is the summary of all the results we've seen so far: CPU CORES/THREADS TIME You are short on RAM (which all current M1 machines are). So a build that only utilizes performance cores might still make sense if

While somewhat slower than the all-core build, it also uses less memory. So here the 5Ghz XeonĬore is actually slower than the 3.2Ghz M1.Īnother interesting result is a 4-thread run which would only use the build2-install-0.13.0.sh -local -yes -j 1 ~/installįor comparison, E-2288G gets the job done in 826s. Indicative of how the CPU would perform in an incremental build: $ time sh. Especially when you consider thatĭuring the build the workstation is belching hot air and screaming like anĪirplane about to take off while M1 is whisper-quiet with barely warm airĪnother pertinent benchmark result is a single-threaded run, which is Since ARM has weak memory ordering, this also served asĪn additional validation of build2's multi-threadedĪs the first point of reference, let's compare it to my workstation withĪn 8-core Intel Xeon E-2288G (essentially i9-9900K plus ECC). Released before M1 became available, builds and appears to be functioning It was a pleasant surprise that build2 0.13.0, which was

How to compile c in mac